As was mensioned in previouse thread by GIGABYTE - Matt , current status looks like this (as i remember)
Top wishlist:
1) p-state overclocking 2) vga boot priority
Top issues:
1) softbrick 2) problems with some creative cards 3) and ofcause memory overclocking
I already requested this one in the deleted thread and Matt even confirmed this to be coming more than a month ago by now, but anyways: Please give us an option to disable the onboard Intel NIC. I realize this wish probably has the lowest possible priority on the wish list, but it seems like something that shouldn't be too difficult to add.
Edited Jul 11, 2017 12:52:09 GMT -8 by devicetrader
As was mensioned in previouse thread by GIGABYTE - Matt , current status looks like this (as i remember)
Top wishlist:
1) p-state overclocking 2) vga boot priority
Top issues:
1) softbrick 2) problems with some creative cards 3) and ofcause memory overclocking
I already requested this one in the deleted thread and Matt even confirmed this to be coming more than a month ago by now, but anyways: Please give us an option to disable the onboard Intel NIC. I realize this wish probably has the lowest possible priority on the wish list, but it seems like something that shouldn't be too difficult to add.
I think it's in the bios, at least for the K5. I'll have to check when I get home.
As was mensioned in previouse thread by GIGABYTE - Matt , current status looks like this (as i remember)
Top wishlist:
1) p-state overclocking 2) vga boot priority
Top issues:
1) softbrick 2) problems with some creative cards 3) and of course memory overclocking***
As with the original thread my goal here is to be as transparent as possible and give you guys the latest.
One adjustment to the above post - after talking with some AMD guys I don't foresee VGA boot priority happening after the updates to IOMMU grouping. As of right now I believe we are going to be on AGESA 1006 for quite awhile. Most of the developement focus right now is on thread ripper. That does not mean we or AMD has dropped AM4 from the radar, but it is now sharing (human) resources with thread ripper. Thus updates are not as quick as before.
To clarify the last part, "and of course memory overclocking", and frame expectations - We are still working on compatibility, validation, and tweaking XMP to enable more DIMMS. That being said I do not forsee the current ~3200 'ceiling' being broken without a new AGESA update. I think what we have now in terms of speed is going to stay the same - 3200 for most, 3600 for some, and Samsung B being your best bet.
As with the original thread my goal here is to be as transparent as possible and give you guys the latest.
One adjustment to the above post - after talking with some AMD guys I don't foresee VGA boot priority happening after the updates to IOMMU grouping. As of right now I believe we are going to be on AGESA 1006 for quite awhile. Most of the developement focus right now is on thread ripper. That does not mean we or AMD has dropped AM4 from the radar, but it is now sharing (human) resources with thread ripper. Thus updates are not as quick as before.
Please, do not drop vga boot priority from 'must to be done' list, it's still very actual for me.
Ability to use third x16 (x4) slot as primary host vga will be a good possibility.
As with the original thread my goal here is to be as transparent as possible and give you guys the latest.
One adjustment to the above post - after talking with some AMD guys I don't foresee VGA boot priority happening after the updates to IOMMU grouping. As of right now I believe we are going to be on AGESA 1006 for quite awhile. Most of the developement focus right now is on thread ripper. That does not mean we or AMD has dropped AM4 from the radar, but it is now sharing (human) resources with thread ripper. Thus updates are not as quick as before.
Please, do not drop vga boot priority from 'must to be done' list, it's still very actual for me.
Ability to use third x16 (x4) slot as primary host vga will be a good possibility.
And, yep, please, more transparency
Trust me, I asked AMD engineers directly when I was in Taiwan. I wouldn't say its dropped as in wont happen, but consider it very low on the possibility scale.
Trust me, I asked AMD engineers directly when I was in Taiwan. I wouldn't say its dropped as in wont happen, but consider it very low on the possibility scale.
Heh, that's very sad But anyway, thanks for your answer
May be you have some softbrick-related info for public?
Right now I'm Offline I have made 20 posts
I joined May 2017
I've received 1 like
My gender is Male
I currently have no messenger contact information filled out.
I currently have no social network information filled out.
Oh, good to know you guys are still working on the issues. I thought already since the old BIOS thread is gone Gigabyte does not care anymore
Looking forward that you can fix the Creative soundcard "detection issue at cold boot". For the RAMs and such, I can understand people that they are upset they cannot use 3200 MHZ+ but I cant tell you, you will not loose much rendering or processing power at all. Of course 3200 MHz are 33 % more clock than 2400 MHz RAM but it does not make the PC faster. More or less 1-2 % difference in FPS, loading times oder rendering tasks, maximum. Normally 0
People who use 3200 MHz should compare and tell them.
As was mensioned in previouse thread by GIGABYTE - Matt , current status looks like this (as i remember)
Top wishlist:
1) p-state overclocking 2) vga boot priority
Top issues:
1) softbrick 2) problems with some creative cards 3) and of course memory overclocking***
As with the original thread my goal here is to be as transparent as possible and give you guys the latest.
One adjustment to the above post - after talking with some AMD guys I don't foresee VGA boot priority happening after the updates to IOMMU grouping. As of right now I believe we are going to be on AGESA 1006 for quite awhile. Most of the developement focus right now is on thread ripper. That does not mean we or AMD has dropped AM4 from the radar, but it is now sharing (human) resources with thread ripper. Thus updates are not as quick as before.
To clarify the last part, "and of course memory overclocking", and frame expectations - We are still working on compatibility, validation, and tweaking XMP to enable more DIMMS. That being said I do not forsee the current ~3200 'ceiling' being broken without a new AGESA update. I think what we have now in terms of speed is going to stay the same - 3200 for most, 3600 for some, and Samsung B being your best bet.
Hi Matt,
I think all of these things are from quality/performance really good to haves on a flagship AM4 to misc options (sorry, while VGA is important to a few) the TOP priority and a status needs to be on not having to pull the cmos battery out after a shutdown to bring the system back to life, commonly referred to here as a soft brick. This is a bit ridiculous to have to do and PITA to do in some setups and should be embarrassing on behalf of Gigabyte to have a flagship AM4 board that needs to be booted by pulling out the cmos battery first, ESP. when ASRock, MSI and Asus don't have this issue.
As with the original thread my goal here is to be as transparent as possible and give you guys the latest.
One adjustment to the above post - after talking with some AMD guys I don't foresee VGA boot priority happening after the updates to IOMMU grouping. As of right now I believe we are going to be on AGESA 1006 for quite awhile. Most of the developement focus right now is on thread ripper. That does not mean we or AMD has dropped AM4 from the radar, but it is now sharing (human) resources with thread ripper. Thus updates are not as quick as before.
To clarify the last part, "and of course memory overclocking", and frame expectations - We are still working on compatibility, validation, and tweaking XMP to enable more DIMMS. That being said I do not forsee the current ~3200 'ceiling' being broken without a new AGESA update. I think what we have now in terms of speed is going to stay the same - 3200 for most, 3600 for some, and Samsung B being your best bet.
Thanks very much for the updates...but I would also like to know if there could be some attention given to the mATX boards, especially the AB350M Gaming 3. While it is ranked pretty well -- in fact many people are saying it's one of the two best mATX AM4 boards -- it's still kind of sad the voltage control is so lackluster. I think it could live up to it's reputation much better in practice if it could just have some form of voltage control and by that I mean even a simple implementation of LLC. It doesn't have to be multi-level spectacular since nobody's going after overclocking records on 4 phases, but just one level of control could provide peace of mind and a true sense of 'ultra-durability' for a lot of owners.
And, of course, this board shares problems with some of the others and I'm speaking of the infamous Gigabyte 'soft brick' bug. If nothing else, give us some pointers on what we may be doing wrong that leads to this problem.
Right now I'm Offline I have made 2 posts
I joined July 2017
My gender is Male
I currently have no messenger contact information filled out.
I currently have no social network information filled out.
+1 for mATX support. I have a GA-AB350M-D3H with F3 bios and manual memory setup isn't ready. I can set memory command rate and ProcODT, and almost nothing else. Can't set clock multiplier, or voltage, or the main latencies. What I'd really like to do is be able to load XMP and then tweak settings, specifically tRC.
Right now I'm Offline I have made 19 posts
I joined April 2017
I've received 2 likes
My gender is Male
I currently have no messenger contact information filled out.
I currently have no social network information filled out.
Corsair Dual rank 16GBx2 3000MHz CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 still can't post XMP on my Gaming K7, tried all bios versions. F3E has the best results for me, I can post 2667MHz XMP with mem compatibility enabled.
2667 Mhz doens't work on any F4
Also my front panel still has crackling and hissing
In a big hardware community the number of offered gigabyte am4 Mainboards that are being sold as used is already growing... Even myself is thinking about contacting my place if purchase. It's a pity because the hardware itself still is exactly what I wanted. Could you just give as some hint whether the soft brick issue is still on GB's agenda. I think that would be sufficient for many of us. We all know that finding such seemingly random bugs can be a headache...
skizzdog wrote: Jan 24, 2021 16:54:39 GMT -8 Hello I just built a pc using the Gig Z390 M Gaming board.I cannot figure out what drivers to load first.Idont have the CD that came with the board.Can i buy one some place.
arvindh wrote: Jan 22, 2021 18:49:37 GMT -8 Hi,im having 3HD(win10 & Mint) on Aorus B450.now want to install 4th HD with debian10.Is my current setup legacy/UEFI? what care should i take before installing 3rd OS on 4th HD.forum.gigabyte.us/thread/11477/b450-multiboot-legacy-uefi*
razor9103 wrote: Jan 22, 2021 12:00:23 GMT -8 New Z490 Vision D won't boot ... stuck at RED CPU error LED
lima567 wrote: Jan 20, 2021 15:13:51 GMT -8 intender thank you, will try doing that.
masc2279 wrote: Jan 20, 2021 10:45:24 GMT -8 polarox - need more info what board what block version ... I can tell you that I have the EKWB EK-Quantum Momentum TRX40 Aorus Master Monoblock and that block is worth every penny i went thru 3 different solutions and this one is insanely good.
polarox wrote: Jan 20, 2021 8:03:32 GMT -8 hi guys,
does anyone have the bitspower or EK monoblock for this motherboard? Is it worth the money?
intender wrote: Jan 19, 2021 11:55:39 GMT -8 lima567 this is a windows 10 20h2 issue. I had the same thing on one of my computers. I was never able to get logged back into my account on that PC. I moved that drive to another computer and copied over all data I wanted to keep and did a clean install.
joeym wrote: Jan 19, 2021 8:52:33 GMT -8 Is Asus working on a solution for the Intel 300 series?
lima567 wrote: Jan 18, 2021 20:02:50 GMT -8 Have issue “Something happened and your PIN isn’t available. Click to set up your PIN again.” (I disabled start up applications. Trying to get to save mode, when press F12, chose Windows boot, hit enter - gets me back to sign in page. Please help
sozehh wrote: Jan 18, 2021 13:42:41 GMT -8 soooo NOW ASUS is working on resizable bar too....GIGABYTE?
sozehh wrote: Jan 16, 2021 10:58:58 GMT -8 joeym ofc i've done it, signed and trying to spread the petition, gigabyte do your work please and add resizable bar for intel 300 series, it is not an old product, people like me spent 800 euros on aorus xtreme, don't tell me i have already an outdated mb
joeym wrote: Jan 16, 2021 7:15:27 GMT -8 I would strongly recommend that anyone who hasn't already signed the petition do so now. If you already signed it, please share it! This may help encourage all other motherboard manufacturers to follow suite. Link to the petition: chng.it/LKLksG4yQv
iuliug wrote: Jan 15, 2021 16:31:07 GMT -8 Yes ADD BAR support for all boards that support it - but GB will ignore this
vigo wrote: Jan 15, 2021 9:35:47 GMT -8 what is resizable BAR ?
desaccorde wrote: Jan 15, 2021 0:50:15 GMT -8 300 Series MUST be supported, no other way. MSI supports it. They may think they're pushing their customers for a premature upgrade, but guess what? Even if I upgrade, I wouldn't buy a Gigabyte board. Me and all my close friends will never buy Gig again.
johnyb0y wrote: Jan 14, 2021 4:58:11 GMT -8 @gigabyte, I've personally built with half a dozen of your boards and recommended you at least 5 times last year. This will stop if you screw Z390 users with not supporting Re-BAR.*
mezzer wrote: Jan 14, 2021 2:23:19 GMT -8 This will be my last gigabyte mobo if there's no resize bar support on 300 series.
